Westport in Brief!

EverythingWestport.com

Sunday, November 10, 2019

 

Quick Article Index . . .

 

School subcontractor bids are mostly under budget. DEP puts hold on excavating soil near Elementary School well.

 

Letter To the Editor: The inescapable truth is that what we do on the watershed will affect the river.

 

Letter to the Editor: School administrative offices cut out of new Middle-High School plans because of budget cost overruns.

 

Letter to the Editor: This Veterans Day let us all remember our Pledge of Allegiance.

 

WLT - Protecting the Missing Link.

 

 

School subcontractor bids are mostly under budget. DEP puts hold on excavating soil near Elementary School well.

DEP orders immediate stop on all work within 250 feet of the Elementary School well.

EverythingWestport.com

Friday, November 8, 2019

Photos | EverythingWestport.com

 

By Robert Barboza

Special to EverythingWestport.com

 

WESTPORT - The Westport School Building Committee was thrilled to hear at its Nov. 6 meeting that 15 final subcontractor bids for major portions of the new Westport Middle High School came in mostly under the construction management company’s pre-bid estimates of $33.8 million for the work.

 

The 15 low-bidding contractors fine-tuned their proposals to come up with contract offers totaling $30.85 million, some $2.97 million under Agostini Bacon’s estimates for the bids for masonry, roofing, windows, and flooring, plus plumbing, heating, and electrical systems, reported Agostini project manager Bob Gilchrist.

 

“The public bidding process for trade contractors closed on November 1, 2019 and the sum of the low bids puts the project at least $2.5 Million under budget. Together with the earlier bids for site, steel and concrete work, over 70% of the total cost now includes hard bids from subcontractors. The value management process, along with increased competition, has yielded substantial savings to the Town of Westport which will reduce the overall amount that the Town needs to borrow for the project. Construction work continues on the site and the Construction Manager, Agostini Construction, is still targeting completion in time for opening the new school in September 2021.” - Daedalus Projects, Inc., serving as the Owner’s Project Manager

 

The pre-approved bidders also turned in quotes for interior painting, glass and glazing, ceiling tiles, elevators, and a fire suppression system, Gilchrist said. Bids for plumbing, elevators, metal windows, the fire suppression system, and tile installation work were slightly higher than expected, but most major budget items – masonry work, metalwork, roofing, and the HVAC and electrical systems – came in much lower than estimated, he indicated.

 

Inset: Agostini project manager Bob Gilchrist gives the good news to the School Building Committee.

 

Going through the list of 15 low bidders one by one for the committee, Gilchrist said less than half way through, “You’ll see a trend here... almost all of the (major) bids are below the value estimates.”

 

Among the biggest savings over projected costs were masonry, about $270,000 under estimates at $3.48 million; a $799,600 bid for the miscellaneous metal work estimated at almost $1.3 million; and roofing and flashing, with a low bid of $2.64 million for work estimated at $3.26 million, the project manager noted.

 

“Also significantly under pre-bid estimates were the HVAC system, with the low bid of $7.65 million under the projected $8.5 million; and the electrical systems, bid at $5.9 million against anticipated costs of $6.5 million.” Agostini project manager Bob Gilchrist.

 

Bid at $1.74 million, the sprinkler system was almost $225,000 over projected estimates, and the rest of the plumbing work off only $100,000 or so off the estimate, at a low bid of $3.24 million.

 

Taken altogether, being nearly $3 million over projections is “definitely good news for us today,” Gilchrist suggested, asking for a vote to endorse the proposed contracts. He was rewarded with a quick unanimous vote by the building committee to confirm the contracts.

 

The project manager said he hoped the “savings” trend continued to the end of the week, as final bids for drywall, millwork, landscaping, and some other small contract work are due to be submitted. Gilchrist noted that a number of local contractors are bidding on the contracts, “including some who live and work right here in Westport.”

 

DEP orders immediate stop on all work within 250 feet of the Elementary School well.

Unfortunately, some of the savings generated by the initial round of subcontractor bids may be eaten up by a shortage of available fill on site to support the foundation work due to start next week. Gilchrist presented a site work contract amendment authorizing up to $543,600 to be spent on trucking in as much as 40,000 cubic yards of fill if needed, for the committee’s review and consideration.

 

Daedalus Consulting project manager Frances Hughes explained that fill from the hillside on the north end of the site was intended to be used around the foundation, but the state Dept. of Environmental Protection (DEP) ordered an immediate stop to any work within 250 feet of the elementary school well.

 

Gilchrist said three foundation crews were due to start work this week, and available fill was needed immediately. The teams cannot wait for a DEP decision on either the old well, or approval of tests for the new well.

 

DEP has just approved the final testing of the new well drilled to serve the school campus, but ordered a 250 foot no-touch radius maintained around the old well until it is decommissioned. “We’re hoping we can overturn that decision about the (no-touch) radius on the well,” building committee Chair Dianne Baron advised members, but it could take time.

 

She advocated for the fill amendment contract funds to be used as needed; and work “keep moving forward” while there is good weather. If the DEP decision is overturned, site crews will resume mining the high ground for fill around the foundations, and the committee will not have to spend all the money budgeted on imported fill, she explained.

 

Some committee members noted that any extra fill produced on site could always be used to raise the level of the athletic fields behind the school. As planned, the fields are several feet lower than the proposed service road through the campus.

 

Baron noted that previous plan alterations had reduced expected site costs from $9 million to around $8.4 million. The added $543,600 in fill would bring the total site costs right back to the original figure, she suggested.

 

With contingency reserves added, the extra $543,600 in site costs would be inflated to roughly $628,000, bring the total construction budget back up to $54.8 million.

 

Above: CMaR’s George Agostini (second from left) admonishes the School Building Committee to “Get the well working!” The delay in testing the recently-drilled well may cost the project over $500,000 in construction fill costs. DEP has just approved the final testing of the new well drilled to serve the school campus, but ordered a 250 foot no-touch radius maintained around the Elementary School’s old well until it is decommissioned.

 

Photos | EverythingWestport.com

Above: The red-lined box in this overhead drone picture of the school work site outlines the area DEP put a stop order for all construction activity until the Elementary School’s well is disconnected. Click on image to enlarge.

 

 

 

Letter To the editor: The inescapable truth is that what we do on the watershed will affect the river.

One doesn’t have to look far for coastal waters where that future is today’s norm. It’s our time to act. - Bob Daylor

EverythingWestport.com

Saturday, November 9, 2019

 

A year ago, the Town of Westport began the preparation of a Targeted Integrated Water Resources Management Plan for the Westport River estuary. The results of that work will be presented next Wednesday, November 13th, at 6:00 p.m. at the Town Hall Annex.

 

Over this past year there has been input from many interests in the town. There are, of course, advocates for change, but there are also those who point to improving nitrogen levels in some reaches of the river as evidence for standing pat. They also offer as evidence for maintaining the status quo perspectives of the past and that things are getting better.

 

A past of much larger dairy farms, with larger manure piles, cows wandering in brooks directly tributary to the river, and cottages right on the river with cesspools. That look at the past would also show a much smaller year-round population in those cottages.

 

The inescapable truth is that what we do on the watershed will affect the river. Improved septic systems, better stormwater controls, increased wetlands protection and better farm management all help. But nitrogen put in and on the land, no matter where in the watershed, eventually makes its way to the river.

 

The reality is growth in the watershed will occur and will likely increase the load on the river. However, the river’s capacity to handle that load will not increase. In fact, the river shows its stress in seasonal algae blooms, shrinking sea grass beds, more contaminated shellfish grounds and eroded salt marshes.

 

The river’s beauty is not proof of its health. It is within the memory of many when there were much more dense eel grass beds, shellfishery extending to above Hixbridge, and larger salt marsh islands. Now the salt marsh edges are bare, and the red/green harvest area shellfish signs are far south in the estuary.

 

The river is changing; the climate is changing, and our land uses in the watershed have to change to help the river regain its health. Not acting and maintaining the status quo does not save money. It only defers costs for our children and grandchildren to pay — costs hidden in swimming restrictions after rainfalls, no shell fishing, and responses to enforcement actions to clean the river. One doesn’t have to look far for coastal waters where that future is today’s norm. It’s our time to act.

 

Come add your voice to the discussion on how to do so on the 13.

 

Bob Daylor is Chairman of the Working Group Water Resources Management Plan.

 

 

 

Letter to the Editor: School administrative offices cut out of new Middle-High School plans because of budget cost overruns, and no reimbursement from MSBA.

EverythingWestport.com

Saturday, November 9, 2019

 

On behalf of the Westport School Committee, I would like to take this opportunity to respond to Marilyn Pease’s recent letter to the editor regarding the future placement of the school district’s central office administration.

 

In her letter, Ms. Pease suggested that the exclusion of the central administration office space was somehow overlooked during this process or that it may have been deliberately cut during recent meetings when the school building committee had to revisit the building plans due to the initial bids coming in higher than had been anticipated.

 

Neither of these scenarios accurately portrays the truth. The Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) does not support the costs associated with district administrative office spaces as part of its reimbursement program.

 

Inset: The news schools, elevation, façade and roof design were dramatically altered to fit within the MSBA’s approved budget for the project.

 

In May 2015, the town received support from the community to engage in a feasibility study to explore options for relocating students from the Westport Middle School. In early 2017, after an exhaustive examination of three potential sites, several different grade configurations, and multiple new building options including renovations and additions to the existing high school and remediation and abatement of the existing middle school as well as the inclusion/exclusion of central administration office space, a decision was made and approved by the Board of Selectmen and School Committee to build a new, co-located grade 5-12 Middle High School on the site of the abandoned middle school.

 

This decision was made after discussion during the school building committee meetings, which are open to the public and available for public viewing on our local cable access stations. This was clearly communicated during the process. The School Committee engaged in dialogue multiple times during the feasibility process and was aware of the discussion and decision from the school building committee. At no time did either committee try to portray that the central office space was included in the building plans.

 

While individual members of the school building committee, including myself, did express some hesitation about not including the central administration offices in the new building, it was eliminated as an option during the feasibility study process. One can debate about whether or not it should have been included and why that decision was made by the school building committee, but the fact remains that it is not part of the new construction and was not intended to be part of this construction project, as the costs associated with including it in the building would have been borne solely by the residents of Westport and no relief would have been provided through the Massachusetts School Building Authority reimbursement program.

 

Currently, the Westport School Committee is discussing various options relocating the central administrative offices once the new building is complete. These options include using space currently available in the modular classrooms at the Macomber School (which would be a similar expense for the district whether we purchase them or return them to the vendor), leasing office space in Westport, continuing to be located at 17 Main Road pending a decision by the town building reuse committee on the future plans of the Westport High School building, or moving onto the site of the campground space that is currently being purchased by the town.

 

The district will incur costs with any of these options and those costs will not, and never were intended to be, reimbursed as part of the funding program with the MSBA. Members of the School Committee will continue to provide oversight and support to the Westport Community Schools and will do so in an ethical, responsible manner that recognizes the school district’s role within a larger community organization. We are invested in doing what is best for the children and community of Westport and look forward to the opening of the Westport Middle-High School, which will serve as a resource for our community young and old.

 

Antonio Viveiros, Chairman, Westport School Committee

 

 

 

Letter to the Editor: This Veterans Day let us all remember our Pledge of Allegiance.

EverythingWestport.com

Sunday, November 10, 2019

 

On January 14, 1969, Comedian Red Skelton touched the hearts of millions of American with his “Pledge of Allegiance” when he explained the meaning of the words during the Red Skelton Hour, on CBS Television.

 

His recitation was twice read into the Congressional Record of the United States.

 

Today, I stand before you as a humbled Veteran, and share his thoughts with you all. Perhaps it's time to share his words once more to Congress, to our neighbors, and to all Americans:

 

Inset: Photo | EverythingWestport.com

 

I — meaning me; an individual; a committee of one.

Pledge — Dedicate all my worldly goods to give without self-pity.

Allegiance — My love and my devotion.

To the Flag—Our standard; Old Glory; a symbol of Freedom; wherever she waves there is respect, because your loyalty has given her dignity that shouts, Freedom is everybody’s job.

Of the United — That means that we have come together.

States of America — Individual communities that have united, with pride and dignity, and purpose. All divided with imaginary boundaries, yet united to common purpose of love for our country.

And to the Republic — Republic, a state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the people to govern. And, government is the people; it’s from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the people.

For Which it stands — Again that is government of the people, not leaders deciding for the people.

One Nation — One Nation here means, so blessed by God — we used to say.

Under God, I still do say under God not to offend anyone but because I served our country for that individual right.

Indivisible — Incapable of being divided.

With Liberty — Which is Freedom; the right of power to live one’s own life, without threats, fear, or some sort of retaliation.

And Justice — The Principle, or quality, of dealing fairly with others.

For All — which means boys and girls, adults, democrats, republicans, independents and all This Veterans Day let us all remember our Pledge of Allegiance and why All Americans can take pride in those words, and let us also remember our brothers and sisters who served our country, some even giving their lives, so you and I could enjoy these freedoms.

 

Tony Vieira

Westport

 

 

 

WLCT - Protecting The Missing Link.

EverythingWestport.com

Sunday, November 10, 2019

 

WESTPORT – The Westport Land Conservation Trust (WLCT) is very pleased to announce the protection of 25-acres along the upper east branch of the Westport River north of Forge Pond; made possible by a collaborative effort between the Town of Westport Conservation Commission, Community Preservation Committee, and the Westport Affordable Housing Trust spanning more than a decade. The 25-acre Noquochoke Village Open Space Parcel is held by the Town of Westport Conservation Commission and subject to a Conservation Restriction in perpetuity held by the WLCT. The conservation of this parcel adds to a corridor of over 80 acres of protected land between Reed Road and Rte. 177.

 

 

“This project permanently protects 25-acres of important habitat and expands public access to one of our most visited hiking areas: Forge Pond Conservation Area,” said Ross Moran, WLCT Executive Director. “This is a great example of the Town and the land trust working together strategically to improve the quality of life for local residents.”

 

After the acquisition of the property by the Town of Westport’s Affordable Housing Trust with support from the Community Preservation Committee, the land trust and the planning board worked jointly to ensure a portion of the future development would be set aside for conservation. All parties worked in tandem, while WLCT provided technical and on-the-ground assistance in addressing environmental concerns onsite. This work was completed in 2018 and the 25-acre riverfront landscape is now indistinguishable from any other white-pine forest in Westport.

 

“The combination of the new Noquochoke Village development and a corridor of publicly accessible conserved land is an example of the Town getting it right. The Conservation Commission was thrilled to be a part of the project,” said Chairman Paul Joncas. “The commission works hard to ensure a balance of development and preservation of Westport’s vital natural resources.”

 

“This project permanently protects 25-acres of important habitat and expands public access to one of our most visited hiking areas: Forge Pond Conservation Area,” said Ross Moran, WLCT Executive Director. “This is a great example of the Town and the land trust working together strategically to improve the quality of life for local residents.”

 

Local historian and Chairwoman of the Community Preservation Committee, Betty Slade notes the parcels historic significance - “the property was known as the machine lot for the various mills and factories operating along the river. Several famous historical Southcoast figures held interest in the surrounding area including William Rotch Jr. and the estate of Paul Cuffe.” Today, the remnants of the old mills and river crossings can still be found on the property.

 

There is a great deal of work ahead to open up the area for future use. WLCT intends to work with the various stakeholders to develop a Forge Pond Conservation Area Master Plan that identifies funding for improved trailhead access and parking. 33-acres owned by WLCT on the opposite bank of the Westport River have also been identified for trail access from Forge Pond Conservation Area—but would require an expensive pedestrian bridge.

 

WLCT’s partnership with the Westport Conservation Commission has never been stronger. We share a vision for a premier natural area serving hikers, kayakers, and sportsmen,” said Moran. “If our public/private partnership with the Town is successful at Forge Pond Conservation Area, we are talking about a 70+ acre natural area in a densely populated neighborhood of Town that is underserved in terms of access to open space. There is more work still to be done, but we are on our way. A special thank you to the many Town officials who worked on this project.” 

 

WLCT has partnered with the Town and Commonwealth of Massachusetts to protect natural areas since 1972. For more information about these projects or the Westport Land Conservation Trust, please contact Ross Moran, Executive Director at 508.636.9228 x 5021 or ross@westportlandtrust.org.

 

About the Westport Land Conservation Trust

Since its founding in 1972, the Westport Land Conservation Trust has assisted landowners in protecting more than 4,500 acres in Westport, Massachusetts. WLCT is a private non-governmental organization dedicated to local land conservation on behalf of the Westport community. The organization accepts gifts of land and conservation restrictions on land, and assists farm owners in preserving farmland with agricultural preservation restrictions.

 

 

 

 

- - - - - End - - - - -

 

© 2019 Community Events of Westport    All rights reserved.

EverythingWestport.com